ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Association between implant adjacency and survival of endodontically treated teeth.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis retrospective cohort study evaluated the association between implant adjacency and survival of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) and assessed factors associated with tooth loss due to vertical root fracture (VRF). MATERIALS AND
methodsPatient charts were reviewed to identify teeth adjacent and nonadjacent to implants. The primary outcome was cumulative survival of ETT by tooth location and implant adjacency. VRF was the secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank tests compared survival, and multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations accounted for clustering.
resultsA total of 787 patients with 2,048 adjacent and 15,637 nonadjacent teeth were included (mean follow-up: 57.1 months). Among 1,119 ETT, survival was highest in nonadjacent anterior teeth (126.5 months), followed by nonadjacent posterior (84.8 months), adjacent anterior (55.6 months), and adjacent posterior teeth (44.4 months) (p < 0.001). Sixty-three ETT (5.63%) were lost due to VRF. ETT adjacent to implants had significantly higher odds of VRF (aOR = 8.90; 95% CI, 4.03-19.64; p < 0.001), and post placement was independently associated with increased risk.
conclusionsImplant adjacency and posterior location were associated with reduced survival of ETT. Implant adjacency and post placement were independently associated with an increased risk of tooth loss due to VRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ETT adjacent to dental implants may have reduced survival, particularly in posterior regions. Clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of VRF in these teeth, especially when post placement is present. Careful occlusal management and regular follow-up may help mitigate the risk of tooth loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449067What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.