ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Computer assisted intervention to improve diagnostic yield in capsule endoscopy post ingestion.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) examinations frequently become non-diagnostic due to early visibility degradation caused by dirt, bubbles, or sustained mucosal occlusion. Existing computational approaches typically assess examination quality retrospectively, after completion of the study, limiting the opportunity for corrective intervention. We propose a feasibility-aware computer-assisted intervention (CAI) framework that reformulates WCE quality management as a sequential decision problem during acquisition.
methodsEarly checkpoints within the first 10-25% of each examination summarize frame-level visibility impairment using four structured components: mean impairment severity, temporal instability, worst-case continuous collapse, and dominant degradation mechanism cues. These early observations are integrated through logistic normalization to estimate downstream non-diagnostic risk without access to future frames. The framework further incorporates feasibility constraints through estimation of remaining diagnostically relevant transit time and intervention onset latency, enabling anatomically and temporally consistent action recommendations.
resultsOn the clinically annotated GALAR technical subset, early visibility dynamics from the first 20% of examinations achieved non-trivial discrimination of downstream non-diagnostic outcomes (AUROC
conclusionCapsule endoscopy quality management can be formally reframed as a sequential, feasibility-aware CAI problem. The proposed framework enables early, mechanism-consistent, and anatomically feasible intervention decisions rather than purely retrospective quality assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42449022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.