ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Unveiling ocular developmental disorders through short-read whole-genome sequencing.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital eye malformations represent a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders. Despite advances in genetic testing, fewer than half of affected patients receive a definitive molecular diagnosis. However, obtaining a molecular diagnosis is crucial for these patients and their families. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is now standard practice in the genetic investigation of patients, but its contribution has not been extensively evaluated in patients with ocular malformations. In this work, we performed short-read WGS in a cohort of 100 families presenting with eye developmental disorders, including microphthalmia-anophthalmia spectrum (M/A), coloboma, anterior segment dysgenesis, congenital cataracts and/or foveal hypoplasia. Prior to WGS, 47 individuals had undergone targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of genes panels related to ocular development, 11 had chromosomal microarray analysis (CGH-array) and 20 had a combination of both. None had received a definitive genetic diagnosis. WGS identified a (likely) pathogenic variant in eighteen patients. In addition, candidate variants of uncertain significance were detected in nine patients. Notably, fourteen of these variants would have been missed by conventional genes panels or CGH-array, underscoring the broader diagnostic scope of WGS. Our findings demonstrate that short-read WGS significantly improves diagnostic yield in patients with congenital eye malformations, including those previously undiagnosed despite NGS panel testing. These results support the integration of WGS in the genetic evaluation of ocular developmental disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.