ArticleHeredity2026
Genomic evidence for widespread hybridization and demographic history in invasive saltcedar.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological invasions provide opportunities for previously isolated lineages to come into secondary contact, often resulting in hybridization. This process can generate admixed genomes and novel phenotypes, potentially contributing to invasion success. Here, we investigated invasive saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States using genome-wide SNP data from 319 individuals, including the parental lineages Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima. By integrating population genomics, ecological niche modeling, and demographic inference, we reconstructed the origins of invasive populations and characterized admixture across major river basins. Our results reveal that introduced populations are predominantly admixed, with varying ancestry contributions from both parental lineages. Multiple lines of evidence, including hybrid indices, f3-statistics, and phylogenetic network analyses, support extensive admixture among US populations. Demographic inference indicates a recent origin consistent with historical introduction records and suggests that admixed propagules were likely introduced and subsequently expanded. Furthermore, ecological niche analyses suggest significant differentiation and niche expansion in the introduced populations compared to their native parental counterparts. Together, these results demonstrate that hybridization, together with multiple introductions and demographic processes, contributed to the maintenance of neutral genetic diversity and may have facilitated the successful establishment of these invasive populations. More broadly, this study highlights how integrating genomic data with ecological niche analyses clarifies the evolutionary dynamics during biological invasions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.