Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42448911›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2026

Assessing infants' sleep in the home setting: designing rational study approaches.

Sampsa Vanhatalo, Topun Austin, Geraldine B Boylan, Mark Blumberg, Maarten de Vos, Manu Airaksinen, Sofie de Sena, Renée A Shellhaas, Jeroen Dudink

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sampsa VanhataloDepartment of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Sampsa.vanhatalo@helsinki.fi.
Topun AustinNeoLAB, Evelyn Perinatal Imaging Centre, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Geraldine B BoylanINFANT Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Mark BlumbergDepartment of Psychological&Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Maarten de VosDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), STADIUS, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Manu AiraksinenDepartment of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Sofie de SenaDepartment of Physiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Renée A ShellhaasDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
Jeroen DudinkDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methods used for assessing infants' sleep vary widely, and the insights provided by each method are not necessarily interchangeable. Direct physiological measurements are often performed in hospital environments with extensive and controllable instrumentation, whereas at-home assessments have been based on parental questionnaires and diaries or actigraphy measurements. There is a rising need for the establishment of objective at-home methods to improve ecological validity in assessing infant sleep. Here, we review how specific research questions can be aligned with at-home assessment methods, ranging from indirect parental interviews to direct modern measures with unobtrusive sensors (wearables, in-bed sensors, video), and their integrated machine learning -based analytics. We discuss the nature of information available from each method in relation to the physiological or behavioural sleep phenomena. The currently available methods may support disruptive science, including globally harmonized and scaled-up studies across cultures and geographic locations, including fully decentralized developmental research and sleep-focused health care. IMPACT: The paper raises the practical and scientific need to study infant sleep using methods that are both objective and ecologically valid, thereby supporting the use of direct at-home measurements. The paper emphasizes the multifaceted nature of infant sleep, which precludes its assessment as a solitary entity and calls for clear research questions to identify measurable phenomena in sleep-related physiology or behavior Presently available research methods for at-home studies are described and compared in relation to their information content, practical utility and caveats Various analytic results and sleep metrics are described in relation to the underlying sleep physiology or behavior. The overall message emphasizes the need to establish a solid end-to-end waterfall framework in infant sleep research, spanning study questions, sleep phenomena, recording methods, and data analytics.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.