ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Testing the feasibility of deep learning approaches to enhance monitoring of marine macroinvertebrates: Insights from a case study using the gastropod Peringia ulvae.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coastal ecosystems, while vital for their ecosystem services, face growing threats from climate change and human activities. Traditional methods for monitoring these systems, such as morphological species identification and laboratory analysis, are time-consuming and resource-intensive, restricting their scalability. Recent advances in Deep Learning have demonstrated significant potential for automating organism identification and counting from images, streamlining ecological research efforts. Using a common marine gastropod, Peringia ulvae, as a model species, we evaluate the potential for state-of-the-art computer vision methods incorporating self-supervised and few-shot learning techniques, to quantify this marine macroinvertebrate. We tested five machine learning models (CounTR, Segment Anything, Training-Free Object Counting, Grounding DINO, DeepDataSpace) across imaging devices, organism aggregation levels, and compared the performance across models and with human counts to determine accuracy and robustness. Using high-resolution images from a DSLR camera, we found that CounTR and Deep Data Space excelled in scenarios where P. ulvae were aggregated as opposed to spaced. However, model accuracy plateaued at ∼400 individuals per image, emphasizing the need for standardized imaging protocols. We also explored the strengths and limitations of computer vision-based approaches compared to traditional laboratory methods. Although computer vision is not a replacement for traditional laboratory techniques, it can offer a scalable alternative for processing samples associated with ecological monitoring programs if models are trained appropriately. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to transform ecosystem research while pinpointing areas for development, such as adapting models for mixed-species samples and considering associated detritus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.