ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
State HIV Prevention Policy Environments and HIV Prevention Outcomes: Racial and Ethnic Differences in the United States.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
State governments have adopted policies to improve the uptake of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP), routine HIV testing, and future HIV vaccination when available. However, associations between policy environments and PrEP use, recent HIV testing, and HIV vaccine intentions may differ across racial and ethnic groups, signaling varying effectiveness across populations. We collected HIV prevention policies across the US as of January 2024 and constructed policy indices grouped into access-focused, attitude- or norm-focused, and punitive domains. Linking our policy indices to a national survey of men who have sex with men and transgender women, we examined associations of policy environments with current PrEP use and recent HIV testing, as well as HIV vaccine intentions if a vaccine becomes available. More supportive access-focused and attitude- or norm-focused policy environments were associated with higher PrEP use and recent HIV testing among White participants. In contrast, these associations were not significant for Latinx and Black participants. Exploratory analyses provided suggestive evidence that differences in these associations across groups were consistent with differences in access and norms. These results suggest that supportive policy environments are not necessarily associated with smaller racial and ethnic disparities in HIV prevention outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42448863What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.