Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42448854›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Decoding promoter activity from DNA sequence using pre-trained language models.

Christophe Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christophe JungGene Center Munich, Department of Biochemistry, Quantitative and Molecular Biology (QMB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen- Strasse 25, 81377, München, Germany. christophe.jung@lmu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-1125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Promoter architecture plays a central role in transcriptional regulation, but predicting promoter activity directly from DNA sequence remains challenging. Here, we tested whether transformer-based DNA language models can learn regulatory logic encoded in Drosophila core promoters. We fine-tuned the pretrained DNA language model DNABERT-2 using a synthetic core promoter dataset measured in S2 cells with luciferase reporter assays. The model predicted promoter activity well when biological replicates were split between training and test data (R² ≈ 0.91), and retained meaningful performance when test promoter sequences were fully excluded from training (R² ≈ 0.64). Model interpretation using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPromoter Regions, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterGene Expression RegulationLarge Language ModelsSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID42448854
PMCPMC13369180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.