ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
CLEO closed loop framework for synthesizing medical privacy preserving tabular data.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sharing of patient-level structured data is strictly constrained by privacy regulations and governance, creating "data silos" that hinder multi-center research. We propose the CLEO (Clean-Learn-Evaluate-Optimize), a closed-loop framework that integrates a Gaussian Mixture Model generator with Q-learning-based optimization to formalize data synthesis as a Markov Decision Process. Experimental results on a multicenter intracranial aneurysm dataset show that CLEO achieved a combined score of 0.9232 ± 0.0124, outperforming the evaluated representative comparison methods, including TVAE, Gaussian Copula, and CTGAN. In downstream TSTR evaluation, models trained on CLEO-generated data achieved an average AUC of 0.7376, indicating that the synthetic data retained useful clinical decision signals. However, Macro-F1 results also suggest that minority-class prediction remains affected by the imbalanced class distribution. Empirical privacy auditing showed a Nearest Neighbor Adversarial Accuracy score of 0.4940, suggesting low observed re-identification risk under the adopted nearest-neighbor audit setting. These findings indicate that CLEO provides a controllable and empirically auditable framework for supporting cross-institutional research when real-world medical data cannot be directly aggregated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.