ArticleTranslational psychiatry2026
Predicting comorbid anxiety in adolescents with major depressive disorder: an EEG-based machine learning approach with SHAP interpretability.
Article in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comorbid anxiety in adolescents with major depressive disorder (adMDD) is linked to higher suicide risk and poorer prognosis, necessitating precise screening tools. This study developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) framework using electroencephalography (EEG) biomarkers to predict anxiety symptoms in 200 adMDD (aged 12-18, drug-free for ≥ 2 weeks). Participants, stratified by Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA ≥ 14 for comorbid anxiety, n = 172; HAMA < 14, n = 28), underwent EEG recordings. Thirty-two EEG features (time-domain, frequency-domain, nonlinear, Hjorth, and entropy-based) were extracted, and seven machine learning models were trained and validated using 3-fold nested cross-validation. Results indicated the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) have superior predictive performance, with AUC value of 0.72 ± 0.05, accuracy value of 0.83 ± 0.02, precision value of 0.91 ± 0.02, recall value of 0.89 ± 0.03, F1 score of 0.90 ± 0.14, and AUPRC of 0.92 ± 0.03. In addition, SHAP analysis highlighting Normalized first difference, the ratio of Alpha to Beta, and Theta-band power as key predictors. This framework, enhanced by SHAP's global and local interpretability, identifies individualized EEG patterns for anxiety risk, offering a transparent, data-driven tool for personalized diagnostics in adMDD. These findings align with translational psychiatry goals to advance biomarker-based diagnostics in youth mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42448661What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.