ArticleBiomedical chromatography : BMC2026
Development and Validation of a Sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS Analytical Method for Fulzerasib in Rat Plasma and its Application to Pharmacokinetics Studies.
Article in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fulzerasib is a novel, potent, and irreversible covalent inhibitor targeting the KRAS G12C mutation, recently approved in China for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. This study aimed to develop and fully validate a rapid, specific and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of Fulzerasib in rat plasma. Sample preparation was streamlined using a simple protein precipitation technique with acetonitrile. Chromatographic separation was achieved within a 4.0-min run on a C18 column, with verapamil as the internal standard and detection via multiple reaction monitoring. The method was rigorously validated over a linear range of 5 to 5000 ng/mL (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.