Observational studyBritish journal of haematology2026
Real-world outcomes of BrECADD therapy in advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicentre retrospective study.
Observational study in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has been traditionally treated with effective chemotherapy regimens, albeit some associated with substantial toxicity. The recently introduced brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, dexamethasone (BrECADD) regimen has proved more effective and less toxic than escalated BEACOPP (escBEACOPP: bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone). Our retrospective multicentre study assessed outcomes of this treatment in the real-world setting. It incorporated 100 advanced-stage cHL patients receiving BrECADD at 19 cancer centres between July 2023 and October 2025. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end-points included overall response rate (ORR), positron emission tomography (PET)-2 negativity, complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The median age was 30 (18-65) years; 80% had stage IV disease; 85% had an International Prognostic Score ≥3. ORR and CR were 100% and 95%, respectively; 83% achieved PET-2 negativity, enabling therapy de-escalation from six to four cycles. At a median follow-up of 13.7 months, estimated 1-year PFS and OS were 96% and 100% respectively. Only 4% required radiotherapy. Grade ≥3 neutropenia (83%) and febrile neutropenia (55%) were common; yet, 95% of patients completed all planned cycles. Peripheral neuropathy occurred in 25%, mostly grade 1-2. In this real-world cohort, including high-risk patients, BrECADD demonstrated remarkable efficacy and tolerability, supporting its feasibility and potential to reduce chemotherapy and radiotherapy exposure, while maintaining high treatment efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.