ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2026
Hemodynamic Metrics and Arterial Dysfunction: Insights From a Novel Microfluidic Device.
Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemodynamic metrics provide critical insights into the interplay between flow physics and endothelial cell (EC) function in arterial pathologies. Among these, wall shear stress (WSS) is a central regulator of EC function and a key determinant of vascular disease progression. In this study, we review 35 hemodynamic metrics and assess their association with hypertension and atherosclerosis, aneurysms, and thrombosis. Metrics are categorized by magnitude, direction, energy, stagnation time and flow rate to identify those most relevant to specific pathological conditions. We simulate disturbed flow in a novel microfluidic endothelium-on-chip platform using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and analyze 16 key hemodynamic metrics. The most comprehensive description of the complex flow environments is provided by shear rosettes, polar plots of WSS magnitude and direction over the cardiac cycle. The anisotropy ratio (AR) metric, derived from the shear rosette, offers a robust characterization of the multidirectional secondary flow but cannot distinguish steady from unidirectional oscillatory flows. The R-Ratio and minimized transverse WSS (TransWSSmin) metrics effectively quantify bidirectional WSS when computed along principal flow directions. In contrast, transWSS and directional OSI (DOSI) are limited in their ability to quantify bidirectional WSS in regions of low mean WSS or stagnation. A unified metric integrating WSS magnitude and flow bidirectionality is currently lacking. Combining AR with magnitude-sensitive metrics, such as TAWSS, TransWSS_min, or |TAWSS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.