ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Role of dynamic ctDNA monitoring in cervical and anal epidermoid carcinomas under curative chemoradiation.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a promising biomarker to predict recurrence in solid tumors such as colorectal and breast cancer. Defining complete response after chemoradiation remains challenging, as post-treatment inflammatory and tissue changes limit clinical and imaging evaluation.
methodsThe authors conducted a prospective longitudinal study of patients with localized cervical and anal cancer treated with curative-intent chemoradiation with the aim of evaluating the role of ctDNA as a predictor of recurrence. Blood specimens were collected at D1, D29, immediately post-treatment, 8-weeks, 24-weeks, and every 6-months up to 5-years. ctDNA testing (Signatera™) was provided by Natera as an in-kind donation. The primary endpoint was correlation between 8-week ctDNA and recurrence.
results28 patients were evaluable. Ten recurrences occurred, all in patients with positive ctDNA after chemoradiation and before radiologic progression. The median interval between ctDNA positivity and radiologic progression was 3.0-months (range 0.5-21.3). All patients with radiologic complete response at 6 months had negative 8-week ctDNA. Among those without complete response, 8-week ctDNA identified most who later progressed (6/8), while all without complete response who did not progress had negative ctDNA. Eight-week ctDNA positivity was strongly associated with inferior progression-free survival: median 6.7-months in ctDNA-positive versus not reached in ctDNA-negative patients (HR = 40.09, p = 0.001).
conclusionAmong patients with cervical and anal cancer, ctDNA monitoring after definitive chemoradiation identifies individuals without complete response and predicts recurrence. ctDNA positivity at 8-weeks identifies a very high-risk group for whom treatment intensification trials are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.