Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42447493›Full record

ArticleGenetics2026

Parameterizing the genetic architecture under stabilizing selection.

Hanbin Lee, Jonathan Terhorst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanbin LeeDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4545-0027
Jonathan TerhorstDepartment of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7765-2101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across many complex traits, genetic variants with larger effect sizes tend to occur at lower frequencies, which is often interpreted as a signature of stabilizing selection. In statistical genetics, the so-called α-model captures this relationship by assuming that effect size variance is inversely proportional to heterozygosity raised to a power 0 ≤ α ≤ 1. Although empirically useful, the α-model is phenomenological rather than mechanistic and lacks a direct population genetic interpretation. In this paper, we derive an alternative to the α-model based on evolutionary theory. Our approach yields a linear mixed model in which frequency dependence emerges naturally as a function of interpretable evolutionary quantities describing mutational variance, selection intensity, and coupling between the focal and selected traits. These quantities enter through two identifiable variance components that can be estimated by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). The resulting framework links a fitness landscape model to standard mixed-model methodology, enabling both inference on evolutionary parameters and downstream prediction by best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). In forward simulations, the model accurately recovers the focal-trait variance and generally improves genetic prediction relative to conventional α-model baselines.

Indexed as

Linear mixed modelPolygenic traitRestricted maximum likelihoodStabilizing selectionStatistical genetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.