ArticleRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Interlaminar Distance and Bony Landmarks in Lumbar Neuraxial Anesthesia: A Concordance Study].
Article in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate identification of the puncture site in neuraxial anesthesia is essential. Accordingly, this study examines the concordance between interlaminar distance and bone landmark palpation in cases of difficult blockade. Objective: To reduce the risk of complications by enhancing the understanding of lumbar anatomy. Material and methods: A concordance study was conducted in 90 patients scheduled for neuraxial anesthesia, using bone landmark palpation and ultrasound measurement, with descriptive and inferential statistics applied through Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Results: The agreement between interlaminar distance and difficult blockade was κ = 0.565, p = 3.07×10⁻⁸; and between bone landmark palpation and difficult blockade was κ = 0.308, p = 0.00086. The odds ratio between difficult blockade and bone palpation was OR = 5.71 (95%CI: 1.93-16.93); for interlaminar distance and difficult blockade, the OR was 19.5 (95%CI: 5.85-65.00). The probability of encountering a difficult neuraxial blockade using the clinical technique was 80.77%, and with ultrasound guidance, it was 57.78%. Conclusions: An interlaminar distance <1.38 cm and grades 3 or 4 show moderate agreement with difficult blockade. Grades 3 or 4 were associated with a 5.71-fold increased likelihood of encountering a difficult blockade, whereas an interlaminar distance <1.38 cm was associated with a 19.5-fold increase. Based on probability difference, the use of ultrasound prior to neuraxial blockade reduces the likelihood of technical difficulty by 22.99% compared to the traditional clinical technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.