Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2026
[Screening of Hepatitis C virus in blood donors over 11 years].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: HCV infection remains a global concern due to its often asymptomatic course and the potential for transfusion transmission during the window period. In this setting, nucleic acid testing (NAT) can detect early viremia that is not yet identifiable by serology, thereby strengthening blood safety. Objective: To quantify HCV NAT yield (NAT-reactive donations with non-reactive anti-HCV serology, consistent with window-period detection) in blood donors using combined NAT and serology over an 11-year period. Material and methods: Cross-sectional, observational study including 568,569 donations recorded at the CMN Siglo XXI Blood Bank (2014-2025). NAT and serology results were analyzed in accordance with NOM-253-SSA1-2012 to identify donations with a NAT-reactive/serology-non-reactive pattern. Results: One NAT-reactive/serology-non-reactive case was identified, consistent with window-period infection. The NAT yield rate was 0.18 per 100,000 donations (1.8 per million). No risk factors or coinfections were reported, indicating that serology alone would have missed the infection. Because only one case was documented over 11 years, population-level inferences and epidemiologic impact estimates are not supported. Conclusions: In a large cohort within a very low-frequency setting, NAT identified a potentially infectious donation that serology did not detect. Although the absolute yield was low, each detected case is relevant to transfusion safety. Expanding NAT coverage and strengthening voluntary donation are recommended to optimize transfusion safety in Mexico.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.