Trial reportPloS one2026
Agreement and reliability between the two-day 6-minute incremental step test and two-day cardiopulmonary exercise test in post COVID-19 condition for assessing post-exertional malaise: The REVEAL-study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06933017 (Feasibility Study of the Augmented Two-Day 6-Minute Incremental Step Test and Causal Exploration Through a Directed Acyclic Graph and Structural Equation Model for Post-Exertional Symptom Exacerbations in Long COVID Patients), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility Study of the Augmented Two-Day 6-Minute Incremental Step Test and Causal Exploration Through a Directed Acyclic Graph and Structural Equation Model for Post-Exertional Symptom Exacerbations in Long COVID Patients
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-Exertional Malaise (PEM) is a core symptom of post COVID-19 condition (also known as long COVID) affecting millions of people, yet assessment remains challenging. The two-day cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is the current gold standard for objectifying PEM, but its cost and patient burden limit use. The two-day 6-minute incremental step test (6MIST) with wireless wearable sensors could offer a more accessible alternative.
methodsThis cross-over study (n = 25, one-month washout period) evaluated the level of agreement and reliability between the two-day 6MIST and the two-day CPET for assessing PEM. Each "two-day" test consisted of two identical exercise tests separated by 24 hours to capture worsening of symptoms on day 2. Objective (VO2peak) and subjective (fatigue, neuromuscular complaints and rated perceived exertion) PEM outcomes were collected. Subjective outcomes were measured in relation to the first exercise test of each two-day session; at 15 minutes pretest, 15 minutes posttest and 24 hours posttest, with changes analyzed as Δ1 (baseline to 15 minutes posttest) and Δ2 (15 minutes posttest to 24 hours posttest). Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman plots and reliability through consistency Intraclass Correlation Coefficients. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Ref: NCT06933017).
resultsVO2peak and neuromuscular complaints showed low agreement and reliability between the two tests. Rated perceived exertion showed moderate reliability at all times and fatigue showed moderate reliability for changes after 24h (Δ2).
conclusionsContrary to our hypothesis, the two-day 6MIST shows limited agreement with the two-day CPET overall. However, moderate reliability for rated perceived exertion and fatigue suggests potential for improvement with protocol refinement. Further research is needed to optimize the two-day 6MIST and to develop assessments that capture PEM both within and beyond the 24-hour period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.