ArticlePloS one2026
Interference of phototherapy with blue LED light on the behaviour of mice infected with Toxoplasma gondii.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular protozoan capable of promoting physiological and behavioural changes in hosts. When female mammals acquire T. gondii for the first time during pregnancy, Congenital Toxoplasmosis (CT) can occur, posing a significant risk to the foetus. Due to challenges in diagnosing and treating CT, a new blue LED light therapy (BLLT) was proposed to eliminate parasites during placenta and tissue invasion in mice; however, its effects on the behaviour of the animals are unknown. Thus, behavioural analysis was carried out in pregnant infected Swiss mice under BLLT (applied continuously for 12 hours, from 7 am to 7 pm, maintaining an intensity of 460 nm and 7 μW/cm²). Infected mice, regardless of light exposure, exhibited increased inactivity and reduced maintenance behaviours. BLLT influenced certain behaviours, such as an increase in abnormal behaviours in infected mice and higher food and water intake in non-infected mice, suggesting a potential stress effect. Grooming decreased under BLLT in infected mice, while affiliative interactions were reduced in non-infected mice under conventional light. Activity levels were largely unaffected in infected mice, but blue light exposure increased activity in non-infected mice. While our study highlights the potential of BLLT to reduce parasite load, further research is needed to investigate the long-term behavioural and physiological effects, as well as to clarify the mechanisms involved. In conclusion, BLLT may mitigate parasite load and influence behavioural outcomes, while prolonged exposure can act as a stressor, moderately affecting welfare. Future research should explore optimized light regimens, integrate physiological and behavioural measures, and evaluate long-term effects to balance therapeutic efficacy and animal welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.