ArticlePloS one2026
Knowledge and practice of hemodialysis catheter care and associated factors among patients on maintenance hemodialysis: An analytical cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective care of hemodialysis catheters (HDCs) is essential for preventing complications, particularly catheter-related infections, among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. However, gaps in patient knowledge and practice may compromise optimal catheter care. This study assessed the level of knowledge and practice of HDC care and identified factors associated with these outcomes among patients on maintenance hemodialysis.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 97 patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as knowledge and practice related to HDC care. Knowledge and practice scores were categorized using an 80% cutoff. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with knowledge and practice. Model fitness and multicollinearity were assessed.
resultsOverall, 51.5% of respondents demonstrated satisfactory knowledge, while 45.4% reported satisfactory HDC care practices. Knowledge was highest regarding the purpose and insertion site of the catheter but lower for aspects related to infection recognition and dressing care. In multivariable analysis, female sex (AOR: 3.09; 95%CI: 1.12, 8.54; p = 0.030) and shorter duration on hemodialysis (<2 years) (AOR: 3.66; 95%CI: 1.28, 10.50; p = 0.016) were independently associated with satisfactory knowledge. Regarding practice, knowledge emerged as the only independent predictor, with respondents having satisfactory knowledge demonstrating significantly higher odds of satisfactory practice (AOR: 47.39; 95%CI: 11.14, 201.64; p < 0.001). Other variables were not significantly associated with practice after adjustment.
conclusionLess than half of patients demonstrated satisfactory HDC care practices despite moderate levels of knowledge. Knowledge was strongly associated with practice, highlighting its potential importance in supporting optimal catheter care behaviors. These findings indicate that targeted and sustained patient education may be important in improving knowledge and supporting better catheter care practices. Further multicenter and longitudinal studies using more robust measurement approaches are recommended to better clarify factors influencing HDC care practices and related outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.