ArticlePloS one2026
Non-native plant integration into plant-insect pollinator networks in urban parks.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pollination sustains biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, yet it is increasingly threatened by biological invasions. Non-native plants frequently integrate into plant-pollinator networks, generating both positive and negative effects on native plants. However, most current knowledge derives from static or short-term studies of communities invaded by a few species, offering limited understanding of plant-pollinator dynamics in systems where many non-native species coexist under favorable environmental conditions. Here, we examined plant-insect pollinator networks in urban green areas of a Mediterranean city as a model system to evaluate the role of non-native plants in structuring plant-pollinator networks over the course of one year. We compared native and non-native plants in terms of (i) species-level parameters (normalized degree, strength, specialization, contribution to nestedness, and module roles), (ii) modularity and co-flowering patterns, (iii) persistence of interactions, and (iv) beta-diversity metrics. Non-native plants showed greater specialization and among-module connectivity, whereas native species exhibited greater species strength and within-module connectivity. Native-non-native pairs within modules co-flowered more often, suggesting simultaneous interactions that may foster both competition and facilitation. In contrast, non-native-non-native pairs displayed asynchronous flowering, potentially sustaining shared pollinators over longer periods and mitigating competition. Despite these differences, both groups contributed similarly to temporal network connectivity, and interaction turnover was unaffected by the proportion of non-native species. Overall, these findings reveal that while native and non-native plants play distinct roles in structuring plant-pollinator networks, they do not differ in their contribution to maintaining temporal connectivity. Our study underscores the importance of incorporating temporal and multispecies approaches when assessing the ecological consequences of biological invasions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.