ArticlePloS one2026
Emergency packets handing in queue aware congestion avoidance schemes in IoHT.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Internet of Healthcare Things (IoHT) emerged as an enabling technology that is strongly required for real-time patient monitoring and emergency healthcare services. However, the massive number of messages sent from heterogeneous sensors during the emergency situations generally leads to congestion in the network, causing it to overflow the buffer and lose some vital packets. Existing queue-aware congestion avoidance schemes based on priority queue or FIFO scheduling methods fail to differentiate among several levels of severity in emergency packets, resulting in the delayed or dropped transmission of packets. To addresses the issue of handling the emergency packets in the high and low-priority queues, we propose a scheme called Dual Queue Aware Congestion Avoidance, which operates with a dual queue structure combined with an Emergency-aware Packet Placement Algorithm (EPPA). The scheme classifies packets into high-priority and low-priority queues according to sensor type and assigns an emergency flag to indicate the severity. Unlike conventional FIFO approaches, emergency packets are placed immediately after the currently processed packet to ensure timely treatment without disrupting the ongoing transmission. A large number of simulations are carried out using NS-2.35 on Ubuntu. The results show that D-QACA significantly reduces buffer loss probability and high-priority packet loss-achieving up to 80% lower buffer loss and 90% fewer emergency packet drops compared to state-of-the-art schemes such as QACA and DCCA. The scheme enhances performance through an emergency-aware repositioning mechanism that allows critical packets to be served after the packet currently in processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.