ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Clinical Use of Endotracheal Intubation Without Neuromuscular Blockade: The Current Stage of Knowledge.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endotracheal intubation is a fundamental component of modern airway management in elective and emergency settings. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used to optimize intubating conditions by facilitating jaw relaxation, improving vocal cord visualization, and reducing airway trauma. However, their administration can be contraindicated or undesirable in specific situations, such as procedures requiring intraoperative neuromonitoring, short-duration surgeries, patients with neuromuscular disorders, or critically ill individuals at risk of prolonged blockade or adverse reactions. This review examines current evidence regarding the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of intubation without neuromuscular blockade. Data from randomized trials and meta-analyses indicate that although NMBAs are associated with a higher incidence of optimal intubation conditions and improved first-attempt success rates, their omission does not significantly increase postoperative complications, such as sore throat or hoarseness. The principal concern with NMBA-free techniques remains hemodynamic instability, particularly hypotension and bradycardia, associated with the deeper levels of anesthesia required to suppress airway reflexes. Alternative strategies include short-acting opioids (remifentanil, alfentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil), intravenous hypnotics (propofol, ketamine, and etomidate), inhalational agents (sevoflurane), and adjuncts (dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate). These agents attenuate sympathetic responses to laryngoscopy while preserving neuromonitoring compatibility. Their distinct pharmacodynamic profiles influence intubation conditions, apnea duration, and cardiovascular stability. Current evidence supports the feasibility of NMBA-free intubation in carefully selected patients when performed by experienced clinicians. Individualized risk assessment and careful drug titration are essential. Further large-scale studies are needed to establish standardized protocols and define patient populations most likely to benefit from this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.