Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42447023›Full record

ReviewJournal of bacteriology2026

From hijackers to architects: the role of prophages in bacterial genome evolution.

Lucía Rubí-Rangel, Josefina León-Félix, Claudia Villicaña

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bacteriology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucía Rubí-RangelLaboratorio de Biología Molecular y Genómica Funcional, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0833-6428
Josefina León-FélixLaboratorio de Biología Molecular y Genómica Funcional, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-881X
Claudia VillicañaSECIHTI-Laboratorio de Biología Molecular y Genómica Funcional, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C., Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3737-8416

Funding

CIAD internal funds P00768014SECIHTI 784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prophages, as the integrated or plasmid-like forms of temperate bacteriophage genomes, are critical genetic elements that establish stable interactions with their hosts, profoundly impacting host physiology and ecology. Prophages confer multiple advantages to their hosts. They promote changes in the bacterial genome structure and function-such as rearrangements, introduction of novel genes, and gene expression reprogramming-that often enhance bacterial fitness and persistence. Active prophages influence microbial community dynamics through the lytic-lysogenic cycle alternations, while both active and cryptic prophages modulate host behavior, genomic diversification, and interspecific interactions. Given that lysogeny is ubiquitous in nature, prophages play a pivotal role in shaping bacterial ecological functions and evolutionary trajectories. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of phage development and the contribution of prophages as modifiers of genome structure and function. We further discuss the long-term consequences of shaping genome architecture in the context of bacterial ecology and evolution, and propose emerging research directions to advance our understanding of phage-host interactions and their impact on microbial ecosystems.

Indexed as

BacteriaEvolution, MolecularGenome, BacterialProphagesLysogenyadaptationcryptic prophagedomesticationgenome plasticityphage-host interactionsprophage inductionprophages

Identifiers

PMID42447023
PMCPMC13492144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.