Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446962›Full record

ReviewBiology of reproduction2026

"Old and new" frontiers in embryo viability assessment: current practices and introduction of emerging approaches.

Sareena Rayne Singh, Madeline Abass, Jakub Bartlewski, Joanna Kochan, Maciej Murawski, Jakub Wyroba, Pawel M Bartlewski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of reproduction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sareena Rayne SinghDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-9972-8462
Madeline AbassDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Jakub BartlewskiDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-9354-6167
Joanna KochanLesser Poland Institute for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility-KrakOvi, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4296-6471
Maciej MurawskiDepartment of Animal Biotechnology, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-7755
Jakub WyrobaLesser Poland Institute for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility-KrakOvi, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-8089
Pawel M BartlewskiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-9137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable assessment of embryo viability remains a critical yet challenging component of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Traditional methods, including morphological grading and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), are either subjective, invasive, or resource intensive. Consequently, non-invasive approaches, including analysis of spent culture medium (SCM) and digital image-based analytical methods, emerged as promising alternatives to support clinical decision-making, though their reliability varies. SCM analyses can detect embryonic DNA and metabolites, but their outcomes are constrained by potential contamination with non-embryonic material and inconsistent amplification efficiency. In contrast, image-based assessment combined with machine learning (ML) enables quantitative, repeatable, and transparent evaluation of embryo architecture. Segmental image analysis of grayscale bitmaps allows for extraction of interpretable phototextural metrics, which have been correlated with developmental competence and ploidy status of embryos. Recent applications of ML-assisted techniques demonstrate comparable or superior predictive performance relative to PGT-A and expert embryologists, highlighting their potential as cost-effective and ethically favorable alternatives. Continued refinement of image acquisition minimizing artifacts, optimizing quality and resolution, and focusing on key regions such as the trophectoderm and inner cell mass, may further enhance their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity. Overall, computerized assessment of embryo microphotographs represents a scalable, non-invasive strategy that can complement or even partially replace invasive testing. By leveraging structured, interpretable image data, algorithms such as r-Algo 2.0 (discriminative image-analysis software) exemplify the emerging role of computational tools in advancing diagnostic precision and objectivity in ART. Highlights  Current methods of embryo viability assessment lack clinical reliabilityNon-invasive image analysis supports accurate embryo quality assessmentTransparent algorithms enhance repeatability of image-analysis techniquesImage-based embryo assessments may complement or reduce the need for PGT-AImaging refinements can further enhance its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianPreimplantation DiagnosisReproductive Techniques, AssistedAneuploidyEmbryo Culture TechniquesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine Learningalgorithmic image analysisAssisted reproductive technologiesembryo viabilityimage-based assessmentpreimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

Identifiers

PMID42446962
PMCPMC13669403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.