Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446851›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical medicine2026

Animal Models for Drug Discovery in Schizophrenia: A Critical View from a Clinical Perspective.

Inga Dammann-Bawadkji, F Markus Leweke, Cathrin Rohleder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inga Dammann-BawadkjiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5878-4149
F Markus LewekeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany. markus.leweke@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8163-195X
Cathrin RohlederDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-1846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder manifesting with diverse positive and negative symptoms as well as cognitive impairments. Current antipsychotics primarily address positive symptoms and frequently cause substantial side effects, highlighting the need for novel therapeutics targeting alternative pathomechanisms. Animal models are widely used to investigate schizophrenia's neurobiology and guide drug discovery, yet their clinical relevance for proof-of-concept (PoC) studies remains controversial. This Current Opinion critically examines the key limitations of animal models in schizophrenia research from a clinical perspective. The disorder's multifaceted nature, involving genetic, environmental, and neurodevelopmental factors, makes accurate replication in animals challenging. Additionally, core human-specific symptoms, like hallucinations and thought disorders, cannot directly be modeled, although some underlying cross-species constructs can be operationalized. We argue that animal models are most informative when used to test specific, well-defined mechanistic hypotheses and when readouts are anchored to human-relevant biomarkers and neurophysiology, rather than interpreted as proxies for diagnostic categories. Accordingly, translational utility is not uniform: predictive performance depends on the induction paradigm, the construct validity of behavioral and neurophysiological readouts, and the clinical endpoint being modeled. We advocate for close collaboration between preclinical and clinical researchers to refine existing models, establish new and translationally relevant paradigms, and clearly define their interpretive scope. Integrating complementary advanced in vitro and in silico models may enhance mechanistic understanding and help prioritize hypotheses and candidates. Still, these approaches should be viewed as adjuncts, not superior replacements, because they cannot yet capture the circuit- and systems-level dynamics relevant to schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoverySchizophreniaAnimalsHumansAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID42446851
PMCPMC13545137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.