ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Real-world clinical outcomes of intermediate-risk PAM50 (i-ROR) in HR+/HER2- early breast cancer and eligibility for adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRisk-adapted strategies are central to early breast cancer (EBC) management, particularly in HR+/HER2 - disease. Prosigna/PAM50 combined with clinicopathologic factors refines prognosis, with clearer guidance at ROR extremes, while decisions in the intermediate-risk (i-ROR) group remain challenging. Although adjuvant iCDK4/6 therapy improves outcomes in high-risk patients, eligibility in i-ROR may be overlooked. This study outlines clinicopathologic features, recurrence-free survival, and iCDK4/6 eligibility in i-ROR EBC to support treatment decision-making.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 554 EBC patients who underwent PAM50 testing at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (2015-2024). Clinical, pathological, diagnostic, follow-up, and recurrence data were obtained from records. Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated RFS, while multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of chemotherapy use within i-ROR. Descriptive statistics assessed eligibility for adjuvant ribociclib (NATALEE) and abemaciclib (monarchE).
resultsAmong 212 i-ROR patients (38%), 71.7% were postmenopausal, 65.5% Luminal A and 34% Luminal B intrinsic subtypes, and 53.7% node-negative. 68.4% did not receive chemotherapy. There were 11 relapses, predominantly Luminal A (72.7%), node-negative (63.6%), and chemotherapy-naive (90.9%). RFS at 12, 36, and 60 months was 100%, 97.9%, and 96.9%. Chemotherapy use was associated with younger age (p = 0.006), node positivity (p = 0.021), and luminal B subtype (p = 0.001). CDK4/6 eligibility was 44.3% for NATALEE and 14.6% for monarchE, with 10.8% meeting both; chemotherapy use was higher in monarchE-eligible patients (41.9% vs. 31.9%).
conclusionsThis real-world cohort of PAM50 i-ROR HR+/HER2 - EBC patients showed excellent prognosis (5-year RFS > 96%), yet relapses still occurred, highlighting the need for improved risk stratification and consideration of adjuvant therapies, including iCDK4/6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.