ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026
Short form scale of parent self-efficacy for general and specialized care for children with special health care needs.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSelf-efficacy in managing healthcare tasks has been shown to predict health behaviors and outcomes. Previous research has established the content validity of a full-length 30-item survey scale to assess the level of parents' self-efficacy when managing their children's healthcare tasks. The goal of this work was to create an efficient and psychometrically strong short form version to aid research and clinical practice. METHODOLOGY: We conducted scale construction using national cross-sectional survey data of English- and Spanish-speaking parents of children and youth with special health care needs (CYSHCN) 0-17 years old (9/2023-12/2023). Self-efficacy was assessed with a 5-point confidence scale [1 (not confident) to 5 (very confident)]. The sample was randomly evenly split into derivation and validation samples. Exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed for the general (14-item), equipment (8-item), and medication care (6-item) long form subscales, but not the therapy and mobility care long form subscales, which were only 1-item long. Spearman correlations were used to assess convergent and divergent validity. Means and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for item scoring.
results1,132 respondents participated (54% Non-Hispanic White; 68% mothers). Derivation and validation samples were n = 566 each. The EFAs revealed single-factor structures for general care items (Cronbach's alpha 0.95); medication care items (Cronbach's alpha 0.91); and equipment care items (Cronbach's alpha 0.85). CFA results confirmed EFA results, with 5 items for general care (Cronbach's alpha 0.87), 3 items for medication care (Cronbach's alpha 0.76), and 3 items for equipment care (Cronbach's alpha 0.77). The mean scores of the new short form subscales were 4.36 (SD = 0.73), 4.41 (SD = 0.77), and 4.19 (SD = 0.86) for general, medication, and equipment care, respectively. DISCUSSION: This 13-item short form scale (5 general care, 3 equipment care, 3 medication care, 1 therapy care, and 1 mobility care sub-scales items) is an efficient, self-administered means of assessing parents of CYSHCN's self-efficacy with managing their child's healthcare. Future work will test the scale's feasibility and utility at identifying parents who may benefit from additional support and training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446815What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.