ArticleBiotechnology letters2026
High-yield RNA extraction from Nepenthes × ventrata pitchers by simple modification of the CTAB method.
Article in Biotechnology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RNA extraction from some plants is difficult owing to the presence of pigments and secondary metabolites in vacuoles and cell walls, which hinder molecular biological studies. In this study, we developed a simple method for high-yield RNA extraction from pitchers of the carnivorous plant Nepenthes × ventrata that is recalcitrant to RNA isolation. RNA was extracted from pitchers of Nepenthes × ventrata at different developmental stages using conventional methods. Additionally, a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method, in which an ethanol-precipitation step at high LiCl concentration was introduced, was used to extract RNA. Conventional purification methods yielded low or negligible amounts of RNA from pitcher tissues of Nepenthes, and the extracts contained visible pigment contamination. The conventional CTAB method, which is effective for RNA extraction from sweet potato tissues, also yielded only a small amount of RNA from Nepenthes tissues; most of the RNA remained in the supernatant discarded during the LiCl precipitation step, along with the contaminating pigments. By replacing this step with ethanol precipitation in the presence of high concentration of LiCl, the contaminating pigments were removed, and RNA with high purity and yield was recovered. Purified RNA could be efficiently used for full-length cDNA synthesis. The modified method requires no expensive extraction kits and is relatively safe because it does not use phenol. Therefore, this method may be effectively applied to plants that are recalcitrant to RNA isolation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.