ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
The comparison of biomechanical and histological findings of cadaveric temporal fascia and dura mater grafts.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis research aims to analyze and compare the biomechanical and histological characteristics of temporal fascia (TF) and dura mater grafts (DM); both obtained from adult human cadavers preserved in 10% formalin solution.
methodsTF and DM samples (bilateral, n = 3 strips per tissue) were obtained from 12 adult human cadavers (6 males, 6 females, age 46-86, mean 73) preserved in 10% formalin solution. Biomechanical tensile test was used to measure the maximum force, stiffness, energy absorption, and maximum deformation, maximum stress, maximum strain, elastic (Young's) modulus, and toughness. Histological analysis assessed collagen and elastic fiber densities using standard staining methods via Pentachrome, Masson Trichrome and Verhoeff staining.
resultsThe elastic modulus, ultimate stress, and toughness were higher in formalin-fixed temporalis fascia than in formalin-fixed dura mater, indicating a stiffer material behavior. Histologically, collagen fiber and elastic fiber densities of grafts were similar.
conclusionFormalin-fixed temporal fascia exhibited higher stiffness and tensile strength than formalin-fixed dura mater, likely due to fixation-induced structural alterations rather than differences in elastic fiber content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446739What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.