ReviewInternational urogynecology journal2026
Dynamic Pelvic Floor MRI in Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Practical Recommendations for Acquisition and Reporting.
Review in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor disorders are common and significantly impair women's quality of life. Dynamic pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become a key imaging modality for the comprehensive assessment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP), combining morphological and functional evaluation. However, practices remain heterogeneous across centres, with substantial variability in acquisition protocols, reporting terminology and grading systems, which limits comparability and multidisciplinary communication. We hypothesized that a standardized acquisition protocol and structured report, based on a unified clinically oriented semiology, could improve the quality and reproducibility of dynamic pelvic floor MRI.
methodsA multidisciplinary expert panel of radiologists specialized in pelvic floor imaging and gynaecologists with recognized expertise in pelvic floor disorders reviewed the contemporary literature and drafted practical recommendations. Proposals were discussed and refined during dedicated multidisciplinary expert meetings and validated by consensus among participating experts.
resultsA unified terminology-dynamic pelvic floor MRI-is proposed. The recommended protocol comprises a morphological phase and a dynamic phase with repeated straining and defecation manoeuvres. Key quality criteria, indications, limitations and pitfalls are defined. A compartment-based structured report is proposed, using external anatomical landmarks (hymenal plane and anal canal) and a clinically oriented grading system aligned with contemporary prolapse assessment.
conclusionsA standardized and clinically oriented approach to dynamic pelvic floor MRI acquisition and reporting may improve clinico-radiological correlation and facilitate multidisciplinary management of pelvic organ prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.