ArticleClinical and experimental rheumatology2026
Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, but not calcium channel blockers, improve peripheral vascular function in systemic sclerosis.
Article in Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare autoimmune disease associated with vasculopathy. Raynaud's phenomenon is a common symptom of SSc, and treatment guidelines support calcium channel blocker (CCB) and phosphodiesterase inhibitor-5 (PDE5i) as first- and second-line therapy, respectively. However, the impact of these drug classes on peripheral vascular function or haemodynamic outcomes in SSc is unknown.
methodsFlow-mediated dilation (FMD) was measured in patients with SSc (n=119) that were allocated into groups based on cardiovascular-acting medications usage within the previous 24 hours.
resultsClinical cardiovascular outcomes were unaffected by acute cardiovascular-acting medications, with the exception of PDE5i that resulted in lower diastolic blood pressure (CV Meds+PDE5i: 66±11 vs. No CV Meds: 74±8; CV Meds: 72±8; CV Meds+CCB: 73±7 mmHg, p<0.05). Patients on CCB had similar FMD to patients with and without cardiovascular-acting medication usage (No CV Meds: 7.6±4.0; CV Meds: 6.2±3.4: CV Meds+CCB: 5.8±3.1%, p>0.05), while FMD in patients on PDE5i (CV Meds+PDE5i: 8.9±4.4%) was greater than patients with cardiovascular-acting medication usage regardless of the presence or absence of CCB usage (p<0.05). A subset of patients (n=17) completed multiple testing visits with and without CCB usage in the previous 24 hours, CCB usage did not affect FMD (no CCB: 6.7±3.4 vs. CCB: 7.7±6.6, p>0.05).
conclusionsAcute CCB usage does not affect peripheral vascular function or haemodynamic outcomes in patients with SSc, whereas acute PDE5i usage results in lower diastolic blood pressure and greater FMD. These findings suggest that PDE5i improves vascular function in SSc, while CCB usage does not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.