Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446684›Full record

ArticleMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents2026

Discovery of new bioactive secondary metabolites from the stem bark of oroxylum indicum: isolation, structural identification, antimicrobial and cytotoxicity assessment.

Dixhya Rani, Meenakshi Sharma, Urvashi Dhiman, Tashi Palmo, Ashutosh Shahi, Kuljit Singh, Prasoon Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dixhya RaniAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Meenakshi SharmaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Urvashi DhimanAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Tashi PalmoAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Ashutosh ShahiAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India.
Kuljit SinghAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India. singhkuljit.iiim@csir.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8225-0622
Prasoon GuptaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002, India. guptap@iiim.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-0609

Funding

CSIR HCP007DST GAP-3185
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify potent antimicrobial compounds from Ayurvedic plant Oroxylum indicum. Phytochemical examination of its stem bark led to the isolation of 29 chemical constituents, including five compounds for the first time from this genus: Chrysophanol (12), Ipriflavone (15), Pinoresinol diglucopyranoside (22), Quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucofuranoside (28), and 5-hydroxy-3,7,8,3',4'-pentamethoxyflavone (29). Notably, compound 28 was a unique flavonoid bearing a β-D-glucofuranoside moiety, very rare in this class. Structural elucidation of the compounds (1-29) was achieved using 1D/2D NMR and HRESI-MS spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis identified two potent compounds (28 and 29) exhibiting MIC and MBC in the range of 0.09 µM to 1.5 µM and 0.7 µM to 6.25 µM against the tested bacterial pathogens, respectively. Further, bactericidal potential of the two identified hit were validated by time-kill kinetics studies. Cytotoxicity assessment in mammalian macrophage cell lines (RAW 264.7 and J774A.1) and hemolysis assays represented an acceptable cytocompatibility profile of these two molecules within the tested concentration range. These findings highlight molecules (28 and 29) as promising compounds for the development of novel antibacterial against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClusiaceaePlant BarkPlant ExtractsAnimalsCell SurvivalGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular StructureRAW 264.7 CellsStructure-Activity RelationshipAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAntimicrobial resistance (AMR)Cytotoxicity evaluationESKAPE pathogensOroxylum indicumSecondary metabolitesTime-kill kinetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.