ReviewArchives of toxicology2026
Involvement of lysosomal proteins in morphology-driven toxicity of (nano)fibers.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fiber morphology (length > 5 μm; respirable diameter < 3 μm) and biopersistence have been linked to their potential to cause fibrosis, lung cancer, and malignant pleural mesothelioma. Among the mechanisms involved, frustrated phagocytosis occurs when macrophages attempt but fail to fully internalize and clear long rigid fibers. Although nanofibers could meet these criteria and trigger frustrated phagocytosis, their small diameters may enable them to entangle, causing them to lose their fiber-like morphology and affecting their toxicological potential. The toxicological assessment of (nano)fibers relies on animal studies; therefore, there is an urgent need to establish in vitro alternatives. Carbon nanotubes, the most commercially prevalent class of nanofibers, have been extensively investigated, and some have demonstrated pathogenic potential, by causing inflammation initiated by cathepsin B translocation from the lysosomes into the cytosol. Independent studies have indicated that only long and rigid carbon nanofibers lead to a decrease of lysosomal enzymes (including multiple cathepsins) inside macrophages and increased levels in the extracellular environment. Thus, different roles for cathepsin B have been proposed in response to nanofiber exposure. To reconcile these observations, this review examines the underlying mechanisms by assessing in vitro studies, particularly how in vitro macrophages respond to carbon-based nanomaterials of distinct morphologies, discusses the limitations of current in vitro models, and evaluates potential approaches for assessing nanofiber toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.