ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Preparation and immune efficacy evaluation of inactivated lumpy skin disease virus vaccine.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lumpy Skin Disease (LSD), historically restricted to Africa, has in recent years exhibited a marked expansion into several Asian and European countries, resulting in substantial economic impacts on the global cattle industry. In August 2019, the first confirmed outbreak of LSD was documented in the Xinjiang region of China. In response to this emerging threat, our study established primary, basic, and working seed banks utilizing the LSDV/MZGD/2020 strain, which was isolated from Meizhou, Guangdong. These seed banks underwent rigorous validation via sterility assays and evaluation of proliferation characteristics. Optimal inactivation parameters for the virus were identified through systematic screening of different concentrations of β-propiolactone. Based on these optimized conditions, we developed two inactivated vaccine formulations: one employing the 201VG adjuvant and the other utilizing aluminum hydroxide adjuvant. Safety assessments demonstrated that both vaccines induced no significant irritation or adverse reactions in New Zealand rabbits and dairy cows, and that pathological examinations revealed no abnormal lesions. Immunogenicity analysis showed that the LSDV-201VG inactivated vaccine elicited robust and sustained serum neutralizing and specific antibody responses in cattle, with elevated antibody titers detected from weeks 4-5 and persisting for up to 8 weeks. In contrast, the vaccine formulated with aluminum hydroxide adjuvant generated relatively low antibody levels and failed to achieve requisite immunogenicity thresholds. Collectively, these results indicate that the LSDV-201VG inactivated vaccine exhibits high safety and immunogenic efficacy, providing a robust technical strategy for the prevention and control of LSD in China and Southeast Asia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42446614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.