Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446590›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Clinical and MRI factors influencing interobserver delineation variability of brain metastases before stereotactic radiotherapy.

Laurie Marchi, Julien Ognard, Alexis Perrot, Anne-Charlotte Roux, Stéphanie Rudzinska-Mistarz, François Lucia, Romuald Seizeur, Olivier Pradier, Gurvan Dissaux, Moncef Morjani and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laurie MarchiRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Julien OgnardRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Alexis PerrotRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Anne-Charlotte RouxRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Stéphanie Rudzinska-MistarzRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
François LuciaINSERM UMR 1101, University of Western Brittany, LaTIM, Brest, France.
Romuald SeizeurINSERM UMR 1101, University of Western Brittany, LaTIM, Brest, France.
Olivier PradierINSERM UMR 1101, University of Western Brittany, LaTIM, Brest, France.
Gurvan DissauxRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Moncef MorjaniRadiation Oncology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Brieg DissauxRadiology Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Vincent BourbonneINSERM UMR 1101, University of Western Brittany, LaTIM, Brest, France. vincent.bourbonne@chu-brest.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-0029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovations in systemic therapies have prolonged survival for many cancers, increasing the number of patients living with brain metastases. In stereotactic radiotherapy, steep dose gradients and small target margins mean that delineation differences may affect target coverage and the dose to adjacent normal brain. We aimed to identify lesion- and MRI-related factors associated with interobserver variability in brain metastasis gross tumor volume delineation.

methodsWe retrospectively included 149 patients (354 metastases) treated with stereotactic radiotherapy at the University Hospital of Brest (2014-2022). Four radiology residents delineated each metastasis on pretreatment three-dimensional T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI after completing a structured training set of 40 brain metastases selected outside the study cohort (excluded from all analyses). Lesion characteristics (edema, hemorrhage, necrosis/cystic change, proximity to organs at risk, histology, and volume) and MRI acquisition parameters were collected. Interobserver agreement was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient and the mean distance to agreement (MDA).

resultsMedians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) for Dice and MDAs across metastases (pairwise values averaged per metastasis) were 0.85 (IQR 0.80-0.89) and 0.34 mm (IQR 0.29-0.44), respectively. Lesions with perilesional edema and a larger volume showed higher overlap agreement (Dice); however, MDA increased with lesion volume, consistent with greater absolute boundary deviations in larger lesions. Several distance-to-OAR variables showed significant univariable associations with agreement metrics; however, these findings were inconsistent across Dice and MDA and were not retained in multivariable analysis. Among MRI parameters, 3 T field strength was associated with a slightly higher agreement; no other parameters showed consistent associations in this exploratory analysis.

conclusionInterobserver variability in brain metastasis delineation varies with lesion characteristics and selected MRI acquisition parameters. Standardized contouring guidance and MRI acquisition may reduce variability, supporting quality assurance and peer-review processes for stereotactic radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain metastasesInterobserver variabilityMagnetic resonance imagingStereotactic radiotherapyTarget volume delineation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.