Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446584›Full record

SynthesisActa neurochirurgica2026

Rewiring reward in addiction: a systematic review of human evidence for deep brain stimulation and lesion approaches in substance use disorders.

Yaxel Levin-Carrion, Juan Miguel Riestra, Taylor Campbell, Kevin Titkov, Naeem Gibson, Diana B Riestra, Sedra T Alabed, Shreya Meda, Ashley Raghu, Steve Gad and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta neurochirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yaxel Levin-CarrionRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA. YL1177@njms.rutgers.edu.
Juan Miguel RiestraRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Taylor CampbellRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Kevin TitkovRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Naeem GibsonRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Diana B RiestraRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Sedra T AlabedRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Shreya MedaRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Ashley RaghuRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Steve GadRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Daniel BrennerRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Alejandro PandoRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.
Phillip BempongRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Jonathan H ShermanDepartment of Neurosurgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Petros LevounisRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Newark, NJ, USA.
Robert E GrossRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Department of Neurological Surgery, Newark, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeurosurgical modulation of reward circuitry has been explored for severe, treatment-refractory substance use disorders (SUDs), yet the human literature remains fragmented across targets, modalities, and outcomes, limiting target selection and future trial design. We systematically reviewed human clinical evidence for deep brain stimulation (DBS) and lesion approaches targeting reward network nodes for SUDs, and summarized convergent preclinical findings to identify where the strongest clinical signal exists and to provide a framework for mechanism-informed future trials.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Scopus (inception-September 9, 2025) for human DBS/ablation studies in primary SUDs targeting addiction-relevant nodes (e.g., nucleus accumbens [NAc], ventral capsule/ventral striatum/anterior limb of internal capsule [ALIC], subthalamic nucleus) and reporting extractable outcomes; in vivo addiction-model animal studies were included for mechanistic context. Findings were synthesized narratively.

resultsForty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. The clearest controlled human signal came from bilateral NAc DBS in severe alcohol use disorder, with additional promising but less mature findings in heroin/opioid DBS. In the only randomized delayed-activation trial of bilateral NAc DBS for severe alcohol use disorder (n = 12), abstinent days increased from 27.6% to 56.0% at 6 months (p = 0.014) and 74.2% at 18 months (p = 0.004), and heavy drinking days decreased from 69.6% to 47.4% (p = 0.020) and 35.5% (p = 0.031). Craving improved (OCDS 21.0 to 10.5 at 6 months, p = 0.014; 5.9 at 18 months, p = 0.008), with blinded-phase separation favoring earlier stimulation for abstinent/heavy drinking days (p = 0.048). An open-label alcohol DBS pilot reported drinks/day decreasing from 10.4 to 2.7 at 12 months (p < 0.05) and OCDS from 28.7 to 8.3 (p < 0.05). In heroin use disorder DBS targeting NAc ± ALIC (n = 8), 5/8 remained abstinent for > 3 years; craving VAS decreased from 7.6 to 1.4 at 3 months and 0.8 at 24 months (p < 0.001), with depressive symptoms improving (HDRS 12.4 to 3.4; p = 0.001). In a polysubstance feasibility study (n = 4), two participants maintained abstinence for > 1150 and > 520 days; craving decreased in individuals (opioid craving p = 0.036; benzodiazepine p = 0.001). Biomarker-guided opioid DBS reduced cue-induced craving (6.93 vs 3.09; p < 0.001). Ablation cohorts showed short-term improvements (alcohol NAc ablation: 3/12 relapsed; dependence severity 39.08 to 9.25, p < 0.01), but longer-term relapse and neuropsychological tradeoffs were reported (4-year abstinence 53.8% overall). Preclinical studies highlighted strong target-and state-dependence, including paradoxical relapse augmentation in alcohol-dependent models.

conclusionDBS and lesion approaches should be interpreted as distinct neurosurgical modalities rather than a single therapeutic class. The strongest controlled human signal currently comes from bilateral NAc DBS in severe alcohol use disorder, with additional but lower-certainty DBS evidence in opioid/heroin and polysubstance use disorders. Lesion approaches provide historical and mechanistic support for the relevance of ventral striatal circuitry, but their irreversibility, heterogeneous follow-up, and neuropsychological tradeoffs require a higher evidentiary and ethical threshold. Overall, current data support clinical plausibility and trial-design rationale, but not definitive efficacy across SUD subtypes.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveDeep Brain StimulationRewardSubstance-Related DisordersAnimalsHumansMesolimbic SystemNucleus AccumbensAblationAlcohol use disorderDeep brain stimulation (DBS)Nucleus accumbens (NAc)Reward circuitrySubstance use disorder (SUD)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.