Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446565›Full record

ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Cement augmentation in pertrochanteric fractures : Evidence, indication and surgical application].

Christian Kammerlander, Georg Kornhäusel, Carl Neuerburg

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christian KammerlanderAUVA Unfallkrankenhaus Steiermark Graz & Kalwang, Standort Graz, Göstinger Straße 24, 8020, Graz, Österreich. Christian.Kammerlander@auva.at.
Georg KornhäuselAUVA Unfallkrankenhaus Steiermark Graz & Kalwang, Standort Graz, Göstinger Straße 24, 8020, Graz, Österreich.
Carl NeuerburgKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cement augmentation of cephalomedullary implants was developed to improve anchorage of the head element in osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures and to reduce implant-related failure patterns such as cut-out or excessive sliding. The aim of this review article is to provide a clinical classification of cement augmentation in pertrochanteric fractures, with particular focus on clinical and socioeconomic aspects. Biomechanical studies consistently demonstrate improved rotational stability and cut-out resistance of augmented cephalomedullary fixations. Clinically, several prospective studies show a high level of technical safety and very low rates of mechanical failure. More recent cohort studies and a follow-up of a randomized trial suggest fewer cut-out events, particularly in unstable and osteoporotic fractures, but do not show a proven benefit in terms of mortality or mid-term function. From a socioeconomic perspective, cement augmentation is an effective method for achieving an overall reduction in costs in this area. Cement augmentation is not a routine procedure for every pertrochanteric fracture, but rather a selective add-on for situations with a high mechanical risk.

Indexed as

Bone CementsCementoplastyFracture Fixation, InternalOsteoporotic FracturesProximal Femoral FracturesEvidence-Based MedicineHumansTreatment OutcomeBone CementsFemoral nail antirotationLength of stayMobilityOsteoporosisReoperation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.