Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446490›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2026

The Relationship Between Vision and Performance in Swimming Under Simulated Vision Impairment: Establishing an Empirically Driven Minimum Impairment Criteria for Para Swimming.

Daniel Fortin-Guichard, H J C Rianne Ravensbergen, Kai Krabben, Lieske de Wit, Inger Wouters, David L Mann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Fortin-GuichardDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8279-2969
H J C Rianne RavensbergenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kai KrabbenDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Lieske de WitDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Inger WoutersDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
David L MannDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences and Institute Brain and Behaviour Amsterdam (iBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

International Paralympic Committeethe International Paralympic Committee
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paralympic sport provides tremendous opportunities for individuals with impairment, including vision impairment, but there is controversy about the fairness of competition. Particularly, it remains unclear how much impairment should be necessary to compete. Swimming for athletes with vision impairment presently requires athletes to have a visual acuity of at least 1.0 logMAR to qualify (20/200 or 6/60), though this cut-off is based on the legal definition of low vision, with no evidence to suggest it decreases swimming performance. Accordingly, swimming might currently include individuals without a disadvantage, or exclude those who do have a disadvantage. The aim of this study was to establish the level of visual acuity loss that decreases performance in swimming. Twenty-one national-level swimmers without vision impairment swam 100 m freestyle maximal effort time trials in each of four different levels of vision impairment simulated using plus lenses (plano, +4.00, +6.00, +8.00). Visual acuities ranged from -0.3 to +1.6 logMAR (an acuity of 0.0 logMAR would typically be considered to represent "normal" vision, a negative value better than "normal", and a positive value worse. For reference, under the existing system of classification for VI swimming, an acuity of 1.0 logMAR would qualify an individual to compete in the S13 class, an acuity of 1.5 logMAR in the S12 class, and an acuity worse than 2.6 logMAR for the S11 class). ROC analysis and repeated-measure decision tree were used to establish the level of visual acuity that brought performance below what would be expected by normal variation. Results revealed that a cut-off of at least 1.1 logMAR provided the optimal classification of performance as below-expected performance. In general, performance was not impacted by lesser amounts of vision impairment. The findings suggest that the existing minimum level of impairment required to compete in swimming is close to being appropriate, but that the current threshold may be slightly too low. The results are expected to contribute to the introduction of evidence-based classification rules to be used for swimming in the future Paralympic Games.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformancePara-AthletesSports for Persons with DisabilitiesSwimmingVisual AcuityFemaleHumansMaleblurred visionevidence‐based classificationParalympicswimmingvision impairment

Identifiers

PMID42446490
PMCPMC13367260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.