Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446476›Full record

ArticleDigestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society2026

Predictors of Biliary Drainage Dysfunction Following EUS-Guided Gallbladder Drainage for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Retrospective Study: GALLBLADEUS-2.

M Goudot, D Lorenzo, L Caillo, J Privat, S Ouazana, S Leblanc, B Napoléon, J Jacques, F Moryoussef, J F Bourgaux and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

M GoudotDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nimes, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.
D LorenzoSorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA) & Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
L CailloCHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
J PrivatVichy Hospital, Vichy, France.
S OuazanaSorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA) & Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
S LeblancHôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
B NapoléonHôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
J JacquesLimoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
F MoryoussefPoissy-Saint-Germain Hospital, Poissy, France.
J F BourgauxDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nimes, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.
R GérardCHU Lille, Service des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, Lille, France.
C Loras AlastrueyHospital Universitari Mútua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
S BazagaHospital General de Granollers, Granollers, Spain.
J DanielClinique Saint Jean Sud de France, Saint Jean de Vedas, France.
J AlbouysLimoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
N WillietSaint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-5464
M SchaeferNancy University Hospital, Nancy, France.
A BenezechAvignon Hospital, Avignon, France.
M Camus-DubocSorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine (CRSA) & Hôpital Saint Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
T WallenhorstRennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
P MayerStrasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France.
J GornalsBellvitge University Hospital, University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8857-3556
T MuraDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University Hospital Centre Nimes, Nimes, France.
A DebourdeauDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Nimes, University of Montpellier, Nimes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3785-6948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEndoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage is increasingly used for malignant distal biliary obstruction, yet predictors of drainage dysfunction remain unknown. This study aimed to identify clinical and procedural factors associated with dysfunction, clinical success, and morbidity.

methodsThis retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage with electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction across 17 centers (March 2017-September 2024). The primary endpoint was biliary drainage dysfunction analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression. Secondary endpoints included predictors of clinical success and high-grade adverse events.

resultsA total of 166 patients were included. Technical and clinical success rates were 98.8% (164/166) and 82.9% (136/164), respectively. Among 146 patients in the survival analysis, 12-month biliary patency was 70.4%. Neither the access route (transgastric 68.5% vs. transduodenal 73.5%, p = 0.50) nor stent diameter (8, 10, or 15 mm; p = 0.82) influenced patency. Ascites was the only independent predictor of dysfunction (HR 2.45 [95% CI 1.17-5.13], p = 0.018). Endoscopic ultrasound-confirmed cystic duct patency was independently associated with clinical success (86.7% vs. 69.4%, OR 2.88 [95% CI 1.19-6.96], p = 0.019). The 15-mm stent was associated with fewer high-grade adverse events (14.3% vs. 32.9%, OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.14-0.69], p = 0.004) without affecting patency.

conclusionsIn this large multicenter series, neither access route nor stent diameter influenced biliary patency. Ascites was the sole independent predictor of dysfunction. A protective signal of 15 mm stents against high-grade morbidity warrants prospective confirmation.

Indexed as

CholestasisDrainageEndosonographyAgedFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesStentsdrainageendoscopic ultrasoundgallbladderlumen‐apposing metal stentpancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID42446476
PMCPMC13367258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.