Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446430›Full record

ReviewJournal of chemical information and modeling2026

Machine Learning for RNA-Targeting Drug Design.

Wissam Karroucha, Carlos Oliver, Véronique Stoven, Vincent Mallet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wissam KarrouchaMines Paris, PSL Research University, CBIO, Paris75272, France.
Carlos OliverVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee37235, United States.
Véronique StovenMines Paris, PSL Research University, CBIO, Paris75272, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0828-0759
Vincent MalletMines Paris, PSL Research University, CBIO, Paris75272, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-754X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting RNA with small molecules offers significant therapeutic potential. Machine learning could substantially accelerate preclinical drug discovery, from hit identification to lead optimization. Yet a limitation emerges: drug design machine learning models, designed for proteins, are not readily applicable to RNAs because of fundamental differences between RNAs and proteins in both structural characteristics and interactions with small molecules. RNA-specific approaches have consequently emerged, primarily focusing on binding site identification and virtual screening. In this review, we comprehensively compare machine learning tools for RNA-targeting drug design according to the tasks they address, their methodology and their relevance in RNA-specific contexts. As open challenges will catalyze new method development, we emphasize the need for standardized, drug design-specific evaluation approaches. We provide clear guidelines to establish these standards and present a benchmark assessing the ability of current machine learning models to predict specific drug-RNA interactions.

Indexed as

Drug DesignMachine LearningRNABinding SitesHumansRNAdrug designmachine learningRNAsmall moleculespecificityvirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID42446430
PMCPMC13505966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.