ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Emergency contraception among female university students in Sierra Leone: An exploratory study of use, knowledge, attitudes, and associated factors.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundUnintended pregnancy remains a major public health concern in Sierra Leone, where stigma, misconceptions, and access barriers hinder the timely use of emergency contraception (EC).ObjectivesTo estimate the prevalence of EC use, assess related knowledge and attitudes, and identify associated factors among female university students in Sierra Leone.DesignA cross-sectional study using convenience sampling.MethodsConducted in 2024 among 366 female undergraduate students at Njala University, Sierra Leone, using convenience sampling and a structured, self-administered questionnaire to assess sociodemographic characteristics, EC utilisation, knowledge, and attitudes. The knowledge and attitudes were scored and categorised based on the mean scores. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Pearson's and Spearman's correlations were used for analysis.ResultsAmong participants, 68.3% (n=250) reported ever using EC, with 36.5% (n=91) of ever-users using it within the past four weeks and 29.5% (n=74) between one and three months prior to the survey. Of participants, 53.0% (n=194) had good knowledge, and 49.7% (n=182) had a positive attitude toward EC. Ever-use was more likely among students aged 26-30 years (AOR 3.58; 95% CI 1.42-8.90) and in year two (AOR 2.64; 95% CI 1.25-5.55), but less likely with poor knowledge (AOR 0.16; 95% CI 0.09-0.30) and negative attitudes (AOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.10-0.36). No prior history of EC use was associated with lower odds of both good knowledge (AOR 0.20; 95% CI 0.10-0.41; p < 0.001) and positive attitude (AOR 0.23; 95% CI 0.11-0.46; p < 0.001). Knowledge and attitudes were strongly correlated (r=0.659; rho=0.611; p<0.001).ConclusionEC use is widespread among sampled students but is influenced by knowledge and attitudes. These exploratory findings suggest that targeted, peer- and provider-led education to address misconceptions and improve service navigation could enhance informed contraceptive choices and reduce unintended pregnancies in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.