Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446357›Full record

ArticleRadiology2026

SpaceXray: Feasibility and Diagnostic Capabilities of On-Orbit Medical Radiography.

Sheyna E Gifford, Michael Pohlen, Adam S Wang, David J Lerner, Anna Wadhwa, Michael Cairnie, Jeanne Walter, Karim S Karim, Steven Tilley, Amol Karnick and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sheyna E GiffordDepartment of Aerospace Medicine, Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.ORCID 0000-0002-5137-178X
Michael PohlenDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.ORCID 0000-0001-6067-0696
Adam S WangDepartments of Radiology and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.ORCID 0000-0001-9234-1264
David J LernerRadiology Logistics Consultants, Seattle, Wash.ORCID 0000-0002-3452-8175
Anna WadhwaDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-4333
Michael CairnieMinXray, Northbrook, Ill.
Jeanne WalterMinXray, Northbrook, Ill.
Karim S KarimKA Imaging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9094-6833
Steven TilleyKA Imaging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-5082
Amol KarnickKA Imaging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-4546-1204
Marissa A RosenbergSpace Exploration Technologies, Hawthorne, Calif.ORCID 0009-0004-3366-2120
Lonnie G PetersenDepartment of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.ORCID 0000-0002-5155-9651

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM144273 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI David Shumway Jones, Jacqueline A. Lees · 2022 to 2026
$14.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM144273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background To support crew health during spaceflight, in-flight imaging must extend beyond the capabilities of portable ultrasound (US). Digital radiography may provide improved diagnostic quality and enable equipment monitoring through nondestructive testing. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of a commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) radiography system for on-orbit imaging applications. Materials and Methods In a prospective study, a portable, digital, COTS radiography system was evaluated during the 3.5-day Fram2 polar orbital flight. Anatomic and equipment radiographs were obtained preflight and in-flight by crew participants with 4 hours of training. Radiographs were evaluated by independent radiologists on overall image quality, spatial resolution, contrast resolution, and positioning (Likert scores of 1-5). Preflight radiographs were compared with in-flight radiographs using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Hardware testing and crew surveys were conducted postflight; survey responses were thematically analyzed due to small sample size. Results Three crewmembers participated (mean age, 42.8 years ± 13.9 [SD]; two women). In-flight and preflight anatomic radiographs (seven each) demonstrated no evidence of differences in overall image quality (mean score, 4.86 ± 0.26 vs 5.0 ± 0, respectively;

Indexed as

Portable X-RayRadiographic Image EnhancementSpace FlightAdultEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42446357
PMCPMC13421204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.