Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446341›Full record

ArticleNoise & health

Effects of Hearing Aids in a Simulated Open-Plan Office: A Laboratory Study Involving Normal-Hearing Participants and Simulated Hearing Loss.

Laurent Brocolini, Marion Volpe, Patrick Chevret, Edith Galy, Vassia Peytcheva-Sigaut, Etienne Parizet, Nicolas F Poncetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurent BrocoliniInstitut National de Recherche et Sécurité, 1 rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Marion VolpeInstitut National de Recherche et Sécurité, 1 rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Patrick ChevretInstitut National de Recherche et Sécurité, 1 rue du Morvan, Vandœuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.
Edith GalyLaboratoire d'Anthropologie et de Psychologie Cliniques, Cognitives et Sociales - Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Vassia Peytcheva-SigautLaboratoire d'Anthropologie et de Psychologie Cliniques, Cognitives et Sociales - Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Etienne ParizetINSA Lyon, LVA, UR677, 69621 Villeurbanne, France.
Nicolas F PoncettiINSA Lyon, LVA, UR677, 69621 Villeurbanne, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOver the past decade, the prevalence of hearing aid users in open-plan offices has risen significantly. This study investigates the potential effects of wearing hearing aids on cognitive performance and psychological state in noisy office environments.

methodsA laboratory experiment involved 46 normal-hearing participants. Four sound conditions mixed speech with open-plan office noise at varying signal-to-noise ratios. Stimuli were recorded in a semi-anechoic room using an acoustic dummy head with and without hearing aids, and moderate hearing loss was simulated. Participants performed a 1 h 40 min press review task over headphones. Performance, sound environment perception, fatigue and mental workload were assessed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance was performed to analyse the data.

resultsThe results revealed a significant principal effect of wearing hearing aids on each of the three dimensions of sound environment perception: noisy ( F (1,44)=70.52, ***p < 0.001, ), annoying ( F (1,44) = 58.40, ***p < 0.001, ) and tiring ( F (1,44) = 34.44, ***p < 0.001, ). In all cases, the environment was perceived more poorly with hearing aids (e.g., mean annoyance = 4.4 vs. 2.7). A small but significant effect was also found on external mental workload ( F (1,45) = 6.1 p* = 0.017, ). No significant effects were detected impacting task performance, perceived fatigue or other workload dimensions (available resources, germane workload).

conclusionThe findings suggest that, when activities require high levels of concentration, hearing aids may have a detrimental effect on the perception of the sound environment. However, the results highlight the need for collective prevention. Consequently, workspace acoustics should be optimised, regardless of hearing status.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsHearing LossMental FatigueWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoise, OccupationalPerceptionSignal-To-Noise RatioWorking ConditionsWorkloadHearing aidshearing impairmentnoiseopen plan office

Identifiers

PMID42446341
PMCPMC13399468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.