Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446340›Full record

ArticleNoise & health

Socio-Demographic, Environmental, and Self-Mediated Aural Practices Determinants of Aural Health in Urban Slums of Bhubaneswar, India: A multivariable Analysis to Suggest Recommendations.

Sonali Kar, Angana Ray, Kabikanta Samantaray, Gouri Kumar Rath, Nirmalya Mohapatra, Prem Sagar Panda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonali KarDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Angana RayDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Kabikanta SamantarayDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Gouri Kumar RathDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Nirmalya MohapatraDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.
Prem Sagar PandaDepartment of Community Medicine, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology University, Patia, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751024, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAural morbidity remains an under-recognized public health concern in urban slum populations where environmental noise exposure, poor housing, and unsafe hygiene practices co-exist. Evidence on combined socio-environmental determinants of ear health in such settings remains limited.

methodsA community-based, stratified, cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 residents aged 10-50 years from six urban slums in Bhubaneswar, stratified into low-, medium-, and high-noise zones. Data were collected using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire, otoscopic examination, and tuning fork tests. Associations between socio-demographic, environmental, and behavioral factors with aural morbidity were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOverall aural morbidity prevalence was 21.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.3-25.5), comprising infection only (11.2%), hearing loss only (2.6%), and combined morbidity (7.3%). Screening detected hearing loss prevalence increased across exposure gradients-low (2.4%), medium (11%), and high noise zones (15.6%) ( P  = 0.001). Unsafe ear cleaning ( P  = 0.017), prior infection (<0.001), ear piercing ( P  = 0.002), and lack of ear check-ups ( P  = 0.021) were significantly associated. High noise exposure independently predicted morbidity (AOR), i.e., adjusted odds ratio 8.52; 95% CI: 2.90-25.08). Housing factors, including insect presence, flooding, and unsafe water sources, also demonstrated significant associations.

conclusionAural morbidity in urban slums reflects intersecting environmental, behavioral, and socio-housing risks. Integrating ear and hearing care within National Health Mission (NHM) platforms and Comprehensive Primary Health Care (CPHC) services can advance progress toward Sustainable Development Goals SDG 3 (Health), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities), and SDG 6 (Sanitation) through multisectoral urban health interventions.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureHearing LossNoisePoverty AreasAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHygieneIndiaMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrevalenceear diseasesenvironmental noisehearing losshygienerisk factorsurban population

Identifiers

PMID42446340
PMCPMC13399469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.