ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Emotional responses of veterinary students to first encounters with animal body donors.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Students' first encounters with animal body donors in higher education are a formative and also potentially stressful experience. The complex emotions elicited by body donor use in learning and their effects on professional development have been documented in medical students, but are far less explored in veterinary medical counterparts. In this study, we investigated student emotional responses to animal body donors and the anatomy laboratory in 164 first-year students from three UK veterinary schools. We found that many students feel positive emotions regarding their first body donor encounter, but that it can be a source of negative emotion, too. In particular, performing dissection and the use of whole, recognisable animals prompted significantly more students to report negative emotions (9% and 13% of participants respectively) compared with other class formats and specimen types (p < 0.02). As the first year course progressed, students felt generally positive about encountering body donors. Many students report their feelings surrounding body donor use changed after one (10%) or several classes (35%), whilst others reported that their feelings did not change much (43%). Almost all students felt the use of body donors enhanced their learning, with impacts on academic, practical, and interpersonal benefits cited. Whilst the picture of students' first body donor encounter in veterinary education is generally positive, the findings from this study enable us to suggest interventions that may assist in creating positive, intentional, and inclusive learning environments where animal body donors form an important part of curriculum delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.