ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026
Neurobiosensory and Visual Patterns of Attentional and Emotional Functioning in Children Using Machine Learning: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttentional functioning in childhood emerges from the interaction between cognitive, behavioral, and emotional processes. Children with these vulnerabilities frequently exhibit executive function deficits, including working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and processing speed, which compromise the ability to regulate attention, plan, and organize tasks, and modulate emotional responses, highlighting the need for screening approaches that integrate multiple dimensions of child functioning.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate an automated, real-time, and simultaneous multimodal screening approach capable of identifying individualized cognitive-emotional-attentional profiles and behavior patterns in children through the integration of oculomotor, emotional, and neuropsychological measures, supporting earlier detection and personalized interventions.
methodsA cross-sectional design was used to assess a sample of 260 children aged 7-15 years through a multimodal approach integrating neuropsychological tests (2- and 3-symbol cancellation tasks from the Coimbra Neuropsychological Assessment Battery; Trail Making Test Parts A and B), eye-tracking metrics, and automated facial emotion recognition during rapid naming and emotion recognition tasks. Oculomotor, emotional, and cognitive data were captured simultaneously and in real time, enabling dynamic characterization of cognitive-emotional interactions at millisecond resolution during task performance. A machine learning pipeline based on a random forest classifier, with a gradient boosting surrogate model used for Shapley additive explanations interpretability analyses, analyzed these data to differentiate children with lower attentional performance from children with normative attentional performance.
resultsThe random forest classifier achieved the best performance in the exploratory 80/20 hold-out evaluation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve=0.9527; F
conclusionsThe simultaneous, real-time capture of eye-tracking, emotion recognition, and neuropsychological data, combined with post hoc analysis within an interpretable machine learning framework, may support the identification of behavioral patterns associated with attentional functioning in children. This multimodal approach provides ecologically grounded and behavior-centered indicators that may support future screening and intervention strategies in educational and clinical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.