ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Plasma metagenomic sequencing testing for diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in children and young adults.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Invasive fungal infection (IFI) is challenging to diagnose, often involving invasive sampling. Plasma cell-free metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown promise in diagnosing infections, but data are limited on specific clinical scenarios in which this test is most helpful. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of children and young adults with high-risk conditions evaluated for IFI between December 2016 and November 2024. Clinical concern for IFI was indicated by (i) evaluation with both serum β-D-glucan and galactomannan testing, (ii) either or both of CT scans of sinuses and chest, and (iii) antifungal treatment either started or broadened. Episodes in which mNGS testing was sent within 30 days of initiation or broadening of antifungal coverage were evaluated to determine the diagnostic performance of mNGS testing, using EORTC-MSG criteria for proven or probable IFI as the comparator. We identified 227 episodes in 180 high-risk patients consistent with clinical concern for IFI. Of these, 45 episodes met EORTC-MSG criteria for proven/probable IFI. Plasma mNGS testing was sent in 36 episodes and identified the causative organism in 28. Positive and negative percent agreement for diagnosis of proven/probable IFI in this population was 77.8% and 90.4%, respectively. Among proven/probable cases with mNGS testing, IMPORTANCE: Performance of plasma mNGS testing for diagnosis of invasive fungal infection in high-risk pediatric and young adult patients was comparable to the combination of fungal culture and targeted PCR from invasively acquired samples, suggesting that it might allow earlier diagnosis for some patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.