Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42446179›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2026

Green revolution breeding favored water conservation, but weakened water use sensitivity to rising vapor pressure deficit in US spring wheat.

Tina Koehler, Qiansu Ding, Emma Ossola, James Anderson, Andrea Carminati, Walid Sadok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tina KoehlerRoot-Soil Interaction, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Emil-Ramann-Str. 4/II, 85354 Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6423-6835
Qiansu DingDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN 55108-6026, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3715-7995
Emma OssolaPhysics of Soils and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
James AndersonDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN 55108-6026, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-6517
Andrea CarminatiPhysics of Soils and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-0480
Walid SadokDepartment of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, St. Paul, MN 55108-6026, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9637-2412

Funding

Minnesota Agricultural Experiment StationPhysics of Soils and Terrestrial EcosystemsRoot-Soil InteractionTechnical University of MunichTUM School of Life Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global rise in vapor pressure deficit (VPD) threatens crop production. Plants mitigate high VPD by regulating their transpiration rate (TR). Yield is related to TR, but whether genetic yield gains reflect shifts in TR-VPD responses remains debated. Over the last century, US spring wheat yields have tripled in the Midwest. We aimed to determine (i) whether these gains relate to changes in water-use patterns under rising VPD and (ii) to identify underlying traits. We examined whole-plant TR responses to rising VPD under nonlimiting soil moisture in 14 wheat cultivars released over 105 years, representing a gradient in yield potential. Yield was quantified in a common trial, and morphological and hydraulic properties shaping TR-VPD responses were characterized under controlled conditions. Yield gains temporarily coincided with shifts in water-use patterns under rising VPD. Breeding has maintained a restricted water loss under high VPD in all cultivars. However, the tripling of yield potential around the Green Revolution coincided with the linearization of the TR-VPD response and a reduction in evaporative surface area in modern cultivars. This suggests a more effective water use rather than a reduced total water loss. Daily water-use regulation was associated with traits controlling water demand and supply. TR was restricted at lower VPD (VPDBP), but less effectively (higher slope after VPDBP, more linear TR-VPD response) in plants with a high water demand at low VPD, relative to their water channeling ability. These findings highlight opportunities to improve yields by fine-tuning hydraulic traits.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticumVapor PressureWaterPlant TranspirationSeasonsWater

Identifiers

PMID42446179
PMCPMC13418363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.