SynthesisCell transplantation
Host immune determinants of stromal vascular fraction graft survival: Toward a concept of SVF therapy resistance - A systematic narrative review.
Synthesis in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stromal vascular fraction (SVF)-based therapies and autologous fat grafting have emerged as promising regenerative strategies due to their pro-angiogenic, immunomodulatory, and trophic properties. However, despite encouraging preclinical and clinical findings, therapeutic outcomes remain highly heterogeneous, with marked variability in graft retention and functional efficacy between patients. Increasing evidence suggests that this variability cannot be explained solely by procedural factors or cellular composition, but may also depend on host-related immune and microenvironmental determinants. This review explores the biological mechanisms governing SVF engraftment and introduces the emerging concept of "SVF therapy resistance," defined as the failure of autologous regenerative therapies resulting from maladaptive interactions between transplanted stromal cells and the host tissue environment. Particular attention is given to sterile inflammation, innate immune activation, and early graft-host interactions. Following transplantation, tissue injury and ischemia induce the release of danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), triggering neutrophil recruitment, macrophage activation, complement signaling, and inflammatory remodeling. While controlled inflammatory responses may support tissue repair and angiogenesis, excessive neutrophil activation, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation, persistent pro-inflammatory macrophage polarization, and impaired vascular adaptation may compromise graft survival and regenerative efficacy. The review further discusses how SVF processing, inflammatory priming, stromal cell heterogeneity, and donor-related factors-including obesity, aging, metabolic dysfunction, and chronic inflammation-may influence therapeutic responsiveness. Emerging evidence from mesenchymal stromal cell biology suggests that stromal cells are highly sensitive to inflammatory licensing and microenvironmental cues. Candidate biomarkers and immune profiling strategies capable of identifying responders and non-responders to SVF-based therapies are also reviewed. Finally, these mechanisms are discussed in spinal cord injury, a condition characterized by chronic inflammation and vascular dysfunction. Overall, this review proposes a translational framework linking innate immunity, sterile inflammation, angiogenesis, and stromal cell heterogeneity to the variability of SVF therapy outcomes, highlighting the need for personalized regenerative medicine approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.